Hoka Bondi 8 vs Clifton 9 Comparison and Review
Hokas are one of my favorite shoe brands, and I often get asked if I prefer the Bondi 8 or Clifton 9, since I have both and find them to be worth the investment, although you definitely don’t need both. Everyone has different preferences when it comes to shoes, particularly if you’re someone who stands all day, walks, needs a go-to travel shoe, or runs. Taking all of that into account, I wanted to take all of that into account while giving my best reviews of each, so that you can make the best decision (and purchase) for your lifestyle.
comparing Hoka Bondi 8 vs Clifton 9 for size, fit, and feel
The Bondi 8 is heavier than the Clifton 9; this isn’t super noticeable but will be a factor if you’re looking for a pair to run in (more on that later).
The Bondi 8 also feels a bit bulkier as it is slightly wider than the Clifton 9. Both shoes come in standard & wide versions, but if you have a wider foot, I recommend the Bondi 8.
Both are completely cushioned and feel lightweight on your feet.
Both pairs run true to size. For comparison, I typically size up half a size in Nike, but do not need to for either Hoka pair.
Both are neutral in regards to stability; you won’t feel off balance like you do with some athletic shoes that have an exaggerated arch or curve. If you are particularly worried about this, you may prefer the Bondi 8 as it is slightly wider than the Clifton 9; the Clifton has a narrower base and feel more like a traditional athletic shoe.
Hoka Bondi 8 vs Clifton 9 for standing, walking, traveling, and running
The Bondi 8 is better for standing and light walking. These are extremely comfortable, and the slight extra width and cushion you get on this model versus the Clifton 9 almost makes them feel like a slipper, but with more support. My back doesn’t hurt when I wear these, especially when I’m standing all day.
The Clifton 9 is better for running and more action-filled days, as it is lighter than the Bondi 8. They are lighter and slightly narrower, so they feel like they mold to your feet, which is ideal for running and higher-impact activities. I have had knee problems for over a decade, and I can run and better keep up with HIIT-style workouts when I wear my Clifton’s than I do in Nike or New Balance shoes.
For travel, I think it comes down to personal preference (especially when it comes to the width) as they do feel equally as comfortable and supportive. I’ve traveled and walked all day in both, and have no complaints about either. You really can’t go wrong with either pair of Hokas, and will notice a difference once you start wearing them.
The only time I would recommend against a pair of Hokas is when it comes to weight lifting; the arch support is great for other activities, but I prefer a completely flat shoe when I lift as that feels most stabilizing and comfortable to me.
